SANPremier League · Model TerminalDATA · ···
← Board
Fixture 34scheduledGW 4

Crystal Palace v Ipswich Town

market prices held
Expected goals1.67 — 0.95
Expected points1.86 — 0.88
Over 2.548.7%fair 2.05
Both score50.5%fair 1.98
Most likely1-112.2%
Markets priced27
Ch 01 · Outcome

Match result

The bar is the model's probability; the caret on the same scale is the market's, with the margin removed. The distance between them is the disagreement.

OutcomeModel fill · market caretProbFairΔ mkt
CRY53.5%1.87+2.8 pp
Draw25.8%3.87+0.1 pp
IPS20.7%4.84−2.9 pp
Ch 02 · Book

27 markets

dixon_coles xi001-20260903

Model fair prices, computed as 1 / probability from a Dixon-Coles score matrix. No bookmaker margin is included, and no bookmaker is quoting these. A real price will be shorter than every number here.

Match result
Crystal Palace53.5%1.87
Draw25.8%3.87
Ipswich Town20.7%4.84
Double chance
Crystal Palace or draw79.3%1.26
Crystal Palace or Ipswich Town74.2%1.35
Draw or Ipswich Town46.5%2.15
Draw no bet
Crystal Palace72.1%1.39
Ipswich Town27.9%3.59
A draw returns the stake, so these prices exclude it.
Win to nil
Crystal Palace30.6%3.26
Ipswich Town10.8%9.29
Clean sheet
Crystal Palace38.7%2.58
Ipswich Town18.8%5.31
Ch 03 · Reasoning

What is driving this

computed, not generated

Computed arithmetic, not generated text. Each driver is a stored quantity: the Elo difference replayed from results, points per game over the last five matches, rolling expected goals, and each absent player's share of team expected goals.

Unavailable players26% home against 5% away xG missing
Favours IPS. 4 out and 0 doubtful for CRY, 3 out and 2 doubtful for IPS; measured as the share of recent expected goals those players contributed
Recent form0.20 against 1.60 points per game
Favours IPS. last 5 and 5 completed matches: LLLDL against LWWDD
Team rating gap+107 Elo
Favours CRY. CRY 1503 against IPS 1396, computed from stored results; an Elo-driven model scores RPS around 0.2015 on this league against roughly 0.194 for de-vigged closing odds
Underlying expected goals-0.47 net xG per match
Favours IPS. CRY -1.00, IPS -0.53 across the form window — results are noisier than the chances behind them
Home advantage+60 Elo equivalent
Favours CRY. the football default is around 100 Elo points, but Premier League home advantage fell during the crowdless 2020/21 season and settled lower afterwards, so the ratings carry a smaller term
Ch 04 · Comparison

Both sides

CRY
LLLDL
13 May – 28 Aug
IPS · incl. Championship
DDWWL
25 Apr – 30 Aug
0.20Points per game1.60
4Goals for9
13Goals against8
6.42Expected goals (2 of 5)3.39
1,503Elo1,396

Head to head over 2 meetings in the seasons held (Premier League from 2021-22, Championship from 2024-25): CRY 2, drawn 0, IPS 0. Cup ties and earlier seasons are not included, so a full-history site will show more.

Ch 05 · Market

Bookmaker prices

Real bookmaker prices, collected from published market data.

MarketSelectionBestBookImpliedN
h2haway4.30Tipico23.3%31
h2hdraw3.861xBet25.9%31
h2hhome1.961xBet51.0%31
Ch 06 · Availability

Crystal Palace

26.4% xG out

Share of attacking output is what moves the number, so it is shown rather than implied.

MatetaFWDinjured0%26.4% xG
Hamstring injury - Expected back 11 Oct
Chadi RiadDEFinjured0%
Knee injury - Unknown return date
SarrMIDinjured0%
Groin injury - Unknown return date
UcheFWDunavailable0%
has returned to Getafe CF
Ch 06 · Availability

Ipswich Town

5.3% xG out

Share of attacking output is what moves the number, so it is shown rather than implied.

MatusiwaMIDinjured0%
Muscular injury - Unknown return date
PhilogeneMIDinjured0%
Ankle injury - Unknown return date
TaylorMIDinjured0%
Knee injury - Unknown return date
EmersonnFWDdoubtful75%21.3% xG
Knee injury - 75% chance of playing
FlorentinoMIDdoubtful75%
Calf injury - 75% chance of playing
Ch 07 · Simulation

Re-price without a player

Removing a player scales that side's expected goals by their share of recent attacking output, then rebuilds the score matrix. Every market moves together.

Ch 09 · Divergence

Where the model differs from a price

Shown with the model's own record, because that is what decides how much these are worth.

h2h homemodel 53.5% vs 1.96 (1xBet)+4.9 ppstake 1.0%low confidence
Ch 10 · Calibration

How this model actually scores

Dixon-Coles bivariate Poisson fitted to Premier League results with exponential time decay. Statistical model, no language model involved.

loses to closing market2,281 out-of-sample fixtures
MetricModelMarketΔ
Ranked probability score0.20470.1965+0.0082
Log loss0.98820.9623+0.0259
Brier0.58830.5711+0.0172
Accuracy52.5%54.8%−2.3 pp

Lower is better for the first three. These probabilities are for reading a fixture, not for expecting profit against closing prices. What these numbers mean